A major
goal of InfoLink is to give under-privileged high school students
an interesting and successful college experience - something they
might never have entertained nor thought possible - and a taste
of the fruits of professional employment. This included college-level
education on campus with lots of help available, exposure to several
information technology career possibilities, professional
development training, and a good paying internship
applying new information technology skills.
We
wanted InfoLink students to learn how to be successful in problem-solving
projects, on teams, and using information technology tools.
The tools needed to be both those that would help land good jobs
as well as be valuable for a good start in higher education.
We
wanted our students to be comfortable with learning new computer
skills and packages, and thus adopted a broad, computer
literacy based curriculum. Students learned how to continuously
learn new software, while deveoping a good degree of confidence
and comfort. So the approach was to quickly ground students with
a kind of computing and package, solve some problems, and quickly
move on to the next package. If a student did not like working with
tabular data and relational databases, no problem. In another week
or two, the class would move on to computer graphics or some other
very different area. We used short lectures, on a just-in-time basis,
followed by self-paced, step-by-step tutorials in the computer lab.
Most of the instructor's time was spent one-on-one as problems or
advanced questions arose.
The
only requirements for enrolling in InfoLink were that the student
had to 1) meet low income criteria, 2) be recommended by a high
school teacher affiliated with InfoLink, and 3) have an expressed
interest in information technology. We started InfoLink with after-
and at-school classes in the spring. By the end of that phase, we
had on the order of 50% attrition. Those that stuck with it and
entered the summer, on-campus program at Carnegie Mellon tended
to finsh the program. Instead of hanging out or flipping burgers,
these youths got up early every morning for a half day of demanding
classes followed by professional seminars, site visits, or internships.
These were students who were both smart and motivated.
While
not going as deep as in our regular college classes and providing
more one-on-one help than usual, we just taught master degree material,
especially the problem solving and project work. At the end of the
program, the students looked, acted, and functioned much like college
students. Student project presentations, with clients, faculty,
family, and community members present, were always college-level
quality.
We
did not to judge success by grades, but by willingness of students
to participate fully (students who missed more then three classes
without extenuating circumstances "flunked out"), ability to complete
assigned lab work, and ability to perform as valuable team members
in projects and on internships.
|